<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Not Buy A Toshiba Digital Camera Until You Read This</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalcameraphotography.org/digitalcameraphotographycamerasandequipment/do-not-buy-a-toshiba-digital-camera-until-you-read-this/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalcameraphotography.org/digitalcameraphotographycamerasandequipment/do-not-buy-a-toshiba-digital-camera-until-you-read-this/</link>
	<description>Digital Camera Photography Tips, Information and Camera Sales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:18:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aburto
</title>
		<link>http://digitalcameraphotography.org/digitalcameraphotographycamerasandequipment/do-not-buy-a-toshiba-digital-camera-until-you-read-this/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Aburto
</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 05:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcameraphotography.org/?p=31#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I bought this camera in early 2002.  Pictures are great for the computer viewing and e-mailing.  Program that comes with it is easy to use to download pictures.  Picture quality when you get prints done from a photo store aren&#039;t very clear unless you always use full size and quality for every picture you plan to get on prints.  Even then they have a slight &quot;fuzz&quot; to them.  When I bought this camera it was 3 times the price, but it has just now started having problems with picture taking 2 years later.  At this current price you can&#039;t beat what it can give you.  Has lots of options so you can mess with the pictures you take as if you had a regular SLR type of camera.  Great for the &quot;point and shoot&quot; type also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought this camera in early 2002.  Pictures are great for the computer viewing and e-mailing.  Program that comes with it is easy to use to download pictures.  Picture quality when you get prints done from a photo store aren&#8217;t very clear unless you always use full size and quality for every picture you plan to get on prints.  Even then they have a slight &#8220;fuzz&#8221; to them.  When I bought this camera it was 3 times the price, but it has just now started having problems with picture taking 2 years later.  At this current price you can&#8217;t beat what it can give you.  Has lots of options so you can mess with the pictures you take as if you had a regular SLR type of camera.  Great for the &#8220;point and shoot&#8221; type also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiang
</title>
		<link>http://digitalcameraphotography.org/digitalcameraphotographycamerasandequipment/do-not-buy-a-toshiba-digital-camera-until-you-read-this/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiang
</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalcameraphotography.org/?p=31#comment-56</guid>
		<description>This is my first digital camera and I have owned this camera for about 3 years now and really like it except for a few things.&lt;br /&gt;Pros&lt;br /&gt;-Produces great pictures in good light, and in some but not all, dark light situations&lt;br /&gt;-Uses AA batteries which are easy to find if yours run down&lt;br /&gt;-quick focusing &lt;br /&gt;-Can zoom optically whilst taking movie&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cons&lt;br /&gt;-Takes a long time to power up and get ready to take a picture (about 7 seconds) and this has lead to me missing a few good shots whilst driving past some great scenery.&lt;br /&gt;-Recycle time is slow about 3 seconds&lt;br /&gt;-Movie quality is poor with no sound&lt;br /&gt;-Is bulky to carry&lt;br /&gt;-Shot selection would be easier to perform if accessed via a dial and not a menu option.&lt;br /&gt;-Batteries do not last for 200 pictures&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The above cons are not really major issues for a camera in this price range as it does take great pictures which is what really counts at the end of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is my first digital camera and I have owned this camera for about 3 years now and really like it except for a few things.<br />Pros<br />-Produces great pictures in good light, and in some but not all, dark light situations<br />-Uses AA batteries which are easy to find if yours run down<br />-quick focusing <br />-Can zoom optically whilst taking movie</p>
<p>Cons<br />-Takes a long time to power up and get ready to take a picture (about 7 seconds) and this has lead to me missing a few good shots whilst driving past some great scenery.<br />-Recycle time is slow about 3 seconds<br />-Movie quality is poor with no sound<br />-Is bulky to carry<br />-Shot selection would be easier to perform if accessed via a dial and not a menu option.<br />-Batteries do not last for 200 pictures</p>
<p>The above cons are not really major issues for a camera in this price range as it does take great pictures which is what really counts at the end of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

